Context
This was a new production line where defects occurred only once or twice per year.
Problem
Most inspection systems required large defect datasets to function. With so few defects:
- Data collection was unrealistic
- Competing solutions could not achieve reliable detection
- Training on "normal-only" data produced poor results in practice
Additionally, the customer could not export data and required all setup and training to be done on-site.
What the Customer Needed
A system that could start with very limited data and improve over time under strict on-site conditions.
Hypernology's Solution
Hypernology:
- Generated initial defect data using controlled demo samples
- Provided on-site labeling and training tools
- Enabled the customer to continuously improve the model as new data appeared
All configuration, training, and support were performed on-site.
Outcome
- Inspection enabled despite near-zero defect data
- Customer gained long-term control over model improvement
- System performance improved gradually without vendor dependency
Lesson
Limited data should not prevent automation. Practical systems are designed to work under real-world constraints and improve over time.
Ready to see HyperQ in action?
Talk to us about your inspection challenge. No long demos. No generic pitches.
We'll ask three questions about your line, show you how our AI works on your specific problem in 30 minutes, and tell you exactly what it costs.